Calvinism’s standard position is exhaustive divine determinism, that God unconditionally decreed all things, including sin and evil, every sin, every evil act, every thought, motive, desire, mood, decision, everything. One standard criticism of Calvinism is that this makes God the author of sin. But sometimes, we run across somebody who claims to be a Calvinist but that exhaustive divine determinism is not the standard Calvinist position. That is very unhelpful because it misrepresents Calvinism and gives the impression that it is better than it is (that is not to say that there are no Calvinists who reject determinism; we are talking about mainstream Calvinism and its creeds such as the Westminster Confession of Faith). Misinformation ruins such discussion right out of the gate. In these two posts, Calvinist scholar James Anderson documents that both the Westminster Confession of Faith (contrary to the claim of Oliver Crisp) and the London Baptist Confession of Faith demand exhaustive determinism. Please click on the links to view:
Home Author/Scholar Index: Calvinist Anderson, James James Anderson, “Libertarian Calvinism?” and “Libertarian Reformed Baptists?”
One Response
Comments are closed.
Recent Posts
J. Munch, “Does Prayer Change Things? Calvinism and Free Will Theism Perspectives”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Does Matthew 13:10-12 / Jesus’ Purpose in Using Parables Support Calvinism?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Eric Landstrom, “Navigating Christian Unity: From Command to Consensus”
, Eric Landstrom, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “Secondary Creation or Cosmogony”
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine Volume 13 Issue 2 (Fall 1995)
, SEA, Comment Closed
- J. Munch, “Does Prayer Change Things? Calvinism and Free Will Theism Perspectives”
- Does Matthew 13:10-12 / Jesus’ Purpose in Using Parables Support Calvinism?
- Eric Landstrom, “Navigating Christian Unity: From Command to Consensus”
- William Burt Pope, “Secondary Creation or Cosmogony”
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 13 Issue 2 (Fall 1995)
