Charles Cameron’s article, “Arminius―Hero or Heretic?” explains that James Arminius comes as a bit of a surprise to both Calvinists and Arminians today, as he is closer to Calvinism than people expect. Cameron starts with some preliminaries about Arminius (his affinity for Calvin’s commentaries, his approach to reconciling differences and his commitment to scripture) and then dives into the 5 points of Calvinism. On Total Depravity, Cameron notes Arminius’ focus on grace, not freewill. On Election, Arminius teaches a Christocentric, evangelical, eternal, decree whereby God chooses to save believers. Cameron questions the “from eternity” and “based on foreknowledge” aspect of Arminius’ explanation of election. On the Atonement, Arminius avoids universalism, but advocates God’s universal love and the availability of forgiveness for all. On Grace, Arminius avoids deterministic necessity, but affirms man’s dependence on God’s grace. On Perseverance, Cameron notes that Arminius does not fit into “Calvinist Arminian patterns of theological pigeonholing”, and that at times Arminius seems to sometimes advocate falling from grace, and sometimes not.
Home Arminianism Friday Files: Cameron’s Arminius- Hero or Heretic?
Recent Posts
Video: David Pallmann, “In Defense of God’s Goodness: An Arminian Challenges the Calvinist Interpretation of Romans 9”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “Attributes of the Absolute Essence of God Part 5: Observations”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Does Matthew 7:24-27 Support Once Saved Always Saved?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “1 Kings 21:29”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “Acts 14:2 – An Interesting Verse”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Video: David Pallmann, “In Defense of God’s Goodness: An Arminian Challenges the Calvinist Interpretation of Romans 9”
- William Burt Pope, “Attributes of the Absolute Essence of God Part 5: Observations”
- Does Matthew 7:24-27 Support Once Saved Always Saved?
- Richard Coords, “1 Kings 21:29”
- Roy Ingle, “Acts 14:2 – An Interesting Verse”

Leave a Reply