Charles Cameron’s article, “Arminius―Hero or Heretic?” explains that James Arminius comes as a bit of a surprise to both Calvinists and Arminians today, as he is closer to Calvinism than people expect. Cameron starts with some preliminaries about Arminius (his affinity for Calvin’s commentaries, his approach to reconciling differences and his commitment to scripture) and then dives into the 5 points of Calvinism. On Total Depravity, Cameron notes Arminius’ focus on grace, not freewill. On Election, Arminius teaches a Christocentric, evangelical, eternal, decree whereby God chooses to save believers. Cameron questions the “from eternity” and “based on foreknowledge” aspect of Arminius’ explanation of election. On the Atonement, Arminius avoids universalism, but advocates God’s universal love and the availability of forgiveness for all. On Grace, Arminius avoids deterministic necessity, but affirms man’s dependence on God’s grace. On Perseverance, Cameron notes that Arminius does not fit into “Calvinist Arminian patterns of theological pigeonholing”, and that at times Arminius seems to sometimes advocate falling from grace, and sometimes not.
Home Arminianism Friday Files: Cameron’s Arminius- Hero or Heretic?
Recent Posts
William Burt Pope, “Divine Attributes Related to the Creature Part 6: General Observations”
, SEA, Comment Closed
X-Calvinist Corner Files: Testimony # 53
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “What Scripture Says, God Says”
, SEA, Comment Closed
How Do You Interpret Isaiah 45:7?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Video: David Pallmann, “A Critique of Eternal Security Part 1: The Case For Eternal Security Considered”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- William Burt Pope, “Divine Attributes Related to the Creature Part 6: General Observations”
- X-Calvinist Corner Files: Testimony # 53
- Roy Ingle, “What Scripture Says, God Says”
- How Do You Interpret Isaiah 45:7?
- Video: David Pallmann, “A Critique of Eternal Security Part 1: The Case For Eternal Security Considered”

Leave a Reply