Charles Cameron’s article, “Arminius―Hero or Heretic?” explains that James Arminius comes as a bit of a surprise to both Calvinists and Arminians today, as he is closer to Calvinism than people expect. Cameron starts with some preliminaries about Arminius (his affinity for Calvin’s commentaries, his approach to reconciling differences and his commitment to scripture) and then dives into the 5 points of Calvinism. On Total Depravity, Cameron notes Arminius’ focus on grace, not freewill. On Election, Arminius teaches a Christocentric, evangelical, eternal, decree whereby God chooses to save believers. Cameron questions the “from eternity” and “based on foreknowledge” aspect of Arminius’ explanation of election. On the Atonement, Arminius avoids universalism, but advocates God’s universal love and the availability of forgiveness for all. On Grace, Arminius avoids deterministic necessity, but affirms man’s dependence on God’s grace. On Perseverance, Cameron notes that Arminius does not fit into “Calvinist Arminian patterns of theological pigeonholing”, and that at times Arminius seems to sometimes advocate falling from grace, and sometimes not.
Home Arminianism Friday Files: Cameron’s Arminius- Hero or Heretic?
Recent Posts
Video: Discussion with Dr. Alan Rhoda on Open Theism
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “Theology Should Ignite Passion (But It Often Doesn’t)”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Ben Henshaw, “Refuting Social Media Calvinism #3: Faith in Christ Means We Depend on Ourselves?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Mark K. Olson, “John Wesley on Animal Redemption”
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine Volume 5 (Fall 1984)
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Video: Discussion with Dr. Alan Rhoda on Open Theism
- Roy Ingle, “Theology Should Ignite Passion (But It Often Doesn’t)”
- Ben Henshaw, “Refuting Social Media Calvinism #3: Faith in Christ Means We Depend on Ourselves?”
- Mark K. Olson, “John Wesley on Animal Redemption”
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 5 (Fall 1984)

Leave a Reply