Charles Cameron’s article, “Arminius―Hero or Heretic?” explains that James Arminius comes as a bit of a surprise to both Calvinists and Arminians today, as he is closer to Calvinism than people expect. Cameron starts with some preliminaries about Arminius (his affinity for Calvin’s commentaries, his approach to reconciling differences and his commitment to scripture) and then dives into the 5 points of Calvinism. On Total Depravity, Cameron notes Arminius’ focus on grace, not freewill. On Election, Arminius teaches a Christocentric, evangelical, eternal, decree whereby God chooses to save believers. Cameron questions the “from eternity” and “based on foreknowledge” aspect of Arminius’ explanation of election. On the Atonement, Arminius avoids universalism, but advocates God’s universal love and the availability of forgiveness for all. On Grace, Arminius avoids deterministic necessity, but affirms man’s dependence on God’s grace. On Perseverance, Cameron notes that Arminius does not fit into “Calvinist Arminian patterns of theological pigeonholing”, and that at times Arminius seems to sometimes advocate falling from grace, and sometimes not.
Home Arminianism Friday Files: Cameron’s Arminius- Hero or Heretic?
Recent Posts
The Arminian Magazine Volume 10 (Spring 1991)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Do You Believe in Jesus Christ? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to Romans 5:9-11?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “Psalm 95:7-11”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 1: Pantheism”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 10 (Spring 1991)
- Do You Believe in Jesus Christ? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
- Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to Romans 5:9-11?
- Richard Coords, “Psalm 95:7-11”
- William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 1: Pantheism”

Leave a Reply