Sovereignty of God - Society of Evangelical Arminians - Page 28

Sovereignty of God

Another Fatal Flaw in Calvinism

October 7, 2010 , , No Comment

by Roger E. Olson

The second fatal flaw that I will describe here in (at least some) Calvinism is worse than the first because it touches not only logic but God’s reputation.

Many Calvinists claim that God loves all people. The only way to make this work within the TULIP system is to redefine love so that it loses all meaning. The crucial question facing Calvinism is why God does not save everyone rather than “pass over” many, damning them to eternal suffering forever (when he could save them because election to salvation is unconditional). As Wesley said, “love” such as this makes the blood run cold. There is no sense whatsoever of “love” compatible with being able to save the loved one from eternal loss and suffering and not doing it.

The First Fatal Flaw in the Calvinist System Revisited

October 6, 2010 , , No Comment

by Roger E. Olson Recently I wrote about flaws and fatal flaws in theological systems. All have flaws. Some also have fatal flaws. One I mentioned that I see in the Calvinist system (as articulated…

Roger Olson, “Theological Flaws and Fatal Flaws”

October 5, 2010 , , No Comment

by Roger E. Olson Recently I argued that every theological system has flaws that should be acknowledged so that the entire system is held somewhat lightly and open to revision. One problem is when a…

God and Evil

September 16, 2010 , , No Comment

by Roger E. Olson Obviously, one posted message cannot begin to solve the problem(s) of God and evil. All I want to accomplish here is clear up some misconceptions about the Arminian view and ask…

On Omnitemporality

September 15, 2010 , geraldowens , No Comment

One of the problems with attempting to discuss the issue of Foreknowledge as it relates to Free Will is that the term itself prejudices the discussion, bending it in a certain argumentative direction that the…

God’s Self-Limitation

September 9, 2010 , , No Comment

by Roger E. Olson Several readers seem to me to ignore an important presupposition of classical Arminian theology and of open theism. (I could probably list some other theologies that also affirm God’s self-limitation, but…

Capstone on “Choice” debate with Paul Manata

July 27, 2010 , Godismyjudge , No Comment

This is the final part of a debate with Paul Manata on determinism.

Arminian Minute: Eye of the Tiger & Romans 9

July 20, 2010 , postpre , No Comment

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21g_zKK_FTk

Arminius vs. Calvin on Unconditional Election

July 7, 2010 , , No Comment

That the doctrine of election (or, as some would have it, predestination) is taught in Scripture is rarely denied. There are those who teach that election or predestination is only related to salvation via means…

Steve Gregg on Calvinism

June 1, 2010 , Richard Coords , No Comment

The full title of the attached file, compiled and arranged by Steve Gregg, is “God’s Sovereignty and Man’s Salvation: Calvinism: Comparative Charts for Evaluating the Biblical Basis for Calvinist and Non-Calvinist Theological Constructs”. Please click…

Another Chilling Calvinist Quote

May 31, 2010 , SEA , Comment Closed

The sovereign God “decides who will believe and undeservingly be saved and who will rebel and deservingly perish.” —John Piper, “How God Makes Known the Riches of His Glory to the Vessels of Mercy,” sermon…

David Pawson – Audio Series on Romans 9-11

May 27, 2010 , Kevin Jackson , No Comment

Here is a good audio series on Romans 9, 10, and 11 by historian / preacher David Pawson. The series is not specifically about Calvinism or Arminianism, however, the subject of the nature of election…

Arminian Internet Resources on Romans 9

May 26, 2010 , Godismyjudge , No Comment

Reviewed Commentaries Ranked One to Eleven The commentaries listed in the table below were subjectively ranked from one to eleven; one being the best, two the next best and so on. Linguistics was scored based…

ANSWERING COLIN MAXWELL, A FREE PRESBYTERIAN IN NORTHERN IRELAND

May 20, 2010 , , No Comment

Colin Maxwell informed the Society of Evangelical Arminians, of which I, William Birch, am a member, that he had “robustly . . . answered Mr. Birch’s satire,” entitled “Reinterpreting Cain and Abel: A Disturbing Satire.”…

John Wesley, A Dialogue Between a Predestinarian and His Friend

May 19, 2010 , Eric Landstrom , No Comment

A Dialogue Between a Predestinarian and His Friend
Out of thine own mouth!

The Works of the Rev. John Wesley, A.M., Volume 10, 1872, pp. 259-266

TO ALL PREDESTINARIANS

1. I AM informed, some of you have said, that the following quotations are false; that these words were not spoken by these authors; others, that they were not spoken in this sense; and others, that neither you yourself, nor any true Predestinarian, ever did, or ever would, speak so.

2. My friends, the authors here quoted are well known, in whom you may read the words with your own eyes. And you who have read them know in your own conscience, they were spoken in this sense, and no other; nay, that this sense of them is professedly defended throughout the whole treatises whence they are taken.

Reinterpreting Cain and Abel: A Disturbing Satire

May 17, 2010 , , No Comment

If Calvinism is true and God “influences the desires and decisions of people,”1 as Wayne Grudem and most Calvinists insist, then let us interpret Scripture accordingly. Adam and his wife, Eve, bore two sons: Cain…

Making God a Liar?

May 14, 2010 , Martin Glynn , No Comment

This was a question that was sent into SEA, and I thought it would be a good idea to share my thoughts on the subject more publicly. The question is as follows: If human beings…

Is Arminianism a Neo-Manichaeanism?

April 28, 2010 , , No Comment

[THIS HAS BEEN EDITED. ALL REFERENCES TO THE ORIGINAL CALVINIST AUTHOR BEING RESPONDED TO HAVE BEEN REMOVED.] Bhagwan, Ishvara, Maheshvara, Parameshvara, Paramatman, Para Brahman, Adi Purusha, Vishnu, Krishna, Rama, Ek Onkar, Satnam, Nirankar, Shoghi Effendi,…

Friday Files: Benson on Proverbs 16:1

April 23, 2010 , Godismyjudge , No Comment

Benson’s comments on Proverbs 16:1 are short and sweet so here are his words: Proverbs 16:1 To man belong the plans of the heart, but from the LORD comes the reply of the tongue. That…

Is There Trauma in Sovereignty? A Response to James Swan by Brennon Hartshorn

April 8, 2010 , bossmanham , No Comment

Arminians and other Libertarians are concerned with determinism, the proposition that all of our actions are made necessary by God in some way. We are concerned because determinism seems to make God the author of sin.

The compatibilist wants to show that we can still be free and responsible for our own actions and they can be determined. David Hume, a skeptic philosopher, tried to show this is the case on a naturalistic framework. Theist determinists adopt some of Hume’s arguments and augment them in order to argue that it is possible that all our actions have been pre-determined, but we freely do those actions and are therefore responsible for them. There have also been other attempts at trying to show that this is possible.