SEA members Dan Chapa and Martin Glynn respond to William Lane Craig’s comments on the Arminian view of Providence. The video can also be viewed on YouTube through this link.
Home Arminianism Video: Arminian Providence: A Response to William Lane Craig
Recent Posts
William Burt Pope, “Attributes of the Absolute Essence of God Part 5: Observations”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Does Matthew 7:24-27 Support Once Saved Always Saved?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “1 Kings 21:29”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “Acts 14:2 – An Interesting Verse”
, SEA, Comment Closed
David deSilva, “What Is the Mystery of the Trinity? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- William Burt Pope, “Attributes of the Absolute Essence of God Part 5: Observations”
- Does Matthew 7:24-27 Support Once Saved Always Saved?
- Richard Coords, “1 Kings 21:29”
- Roy Ingle, “Acts 14:2 – An Interesting Verse”
- David deSilva, “What Is the Mystery of the Trinity? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)”
