“It’s a fair question for the Arminian to ask: How can you preach the free offer of the gospel when you believe in a limited atonement?” So begins Tim Challies’ blog entry for 21 June…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0e63/f0e63e50723981a507418dd29c08bc42fa59fb52" alt=""
, Martin Glynn , Comment Closed
“It’s a fair question for the Arminian to ask: How can you preach the free offer of the gospel when you believe in a limited atonement?” So begins Tim Challies’ blog entry for 21 June…
, Patron , No Comment
The content of this post was authored by J.C. Thibodaux and is posted on his behalf.
Recently, Tim Challies did a review of Roger E. Olson’s Arminian Theology: Myths and Realities,
He cites a paragraph from the book:
“When conservative theologians declare that synergism is a heresy, they are usually referring to these two Pelagian forms of synergism. Classical Arminians agree. This is a major theme of this book. Contrary to confused critics, classical Arminianism is neither Pelagian nor semi-Pelagian! But it is synergistic. Arminianism is evangelical synergism as opposed to heretical, humanistic synergism.”
, SEA, Comment Closed
, SEA, Comment Closed
, SEA, Comment Closed
, SEA, Comment Closed
, SEA, Comment Closed