SEA does not take an official stance on the subject of Molinism. There are some members who are openly Molinist, such as Dan Chapa and Evan Minton. There are others that think that Arminianism and Molinism are incompatible like Brian Abasciano. There are also some that are not Molinist, but think that Molinism are Arminianism are completely compatible. We consider this an internal debate, and as such we have a few articles on it, from a variety of perspectives.
- “Middle Knowledge: What Does God Know?“
- Roy Ingle, “Arminius on the Understanding of God“
- Roger Olson, “Are Arminian Theology and Middle Knowledge Compatible?”
- Evan Minton, “Philosophical and Scriptural Argument For God’s Universal Salvific Will“
- Dan Chapa, “Molinists and Ockhamists on the Loose“
- Evan Minton, “If Jesus Wants Everyone Saved, Why Did He Not Pray For The World?“
- Martin Glynn, “Who Speaks For Arminianism“
- Jordan Japo, “Accepting/Rejecting Calvinism (Pt. 11: Molinism Defended)“
- Capturing Christianity, “The Grounding Objection to Molinism.”
- William Lane Craig, “Defenders Podcast on Salvation, Part #5“
- J. Matthew Pinson, “Was Arminius a Molinist? Richard Watson’s Answer”
- Robert Picirilli, “Can Arminians Be Molinists?” Part 1 and Part 2
