In Brian Abasciano’s article Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner, Abasciano corrects Schreiner’s mistaken notion that corporate election denies any place to the individual. He argues that election is primarily corporate based on 1) the OT concept of election, 2) Paul’s statements about election to salvation and the fact that 3) first century culture was collectivist rather than individualistic. However, even though the primary focus of election is the community, the fact remains that the individual is elect secondarily as a member of the community. All this sets the stage for correctly understanding election in Romans 9 and answering Schreiner’s arguments. (link)
Home Author/Scholar Index: Arminian Abasciano, Brian Friday Files: Brian Abasciano’s “Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner”
Recent Posts
X-Calvinist Corner Files: Testimony # 53
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “What Scripture Says, God Says”
, SEA, Comment Closed
How Do You Interpret Isaiah 45:7?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Video: David Pallmann, “A Critique of Eternal Security Part 1: The Case For Eternal Security Considered”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “Divine Attributes Related to the Creature Part 5: The Goodness of God”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- X-Calvinist Corner Files: Testimony # 53
- Roy Ingle, “What Scripture Says, God Says”
- How Do You Interpret Isaiah 45:7?
- Video: David Pallmann, “A Critique of Eternal Security Part 1: The Case For Eternal Security Considered”
- William Burt Pope, “Divine Attributes Related to the Creature Part 5: The Goodness of God”

Leave a Reply