In Brian Abasciano’s article Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner, Abasciano corrects Schreiner’s mistaken notion that corporate election denies any place to the individual. He argues that election is primarily corporate based on 1) the OT concept of election, 2) Paul’s statements about election to salvation and the fact that 3) first century culture was collectivist rather than individualistic. However, even though the primary focus of election is the community, the fact remains that the individual is elect secondarily as a member of the community. All this sets the stage for correctly understanding election in Romans 9 and answering Schreiner’s arguments. (link)
Home Author/Scholar Index: Arminian Abasciano, Brian Friday Files: Brian Abasciano’s “Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner”
Recent Posts
William Burt Pope, “Attributes of the Absolute Essence of God Part 5: Observations”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Does Matthew 7:24-27 Support Once Saved Always Saved?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “1 Kings 21:29”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “Acts 14:2 – An Interesting Verse”
, SEA, Comment Closed
David deSilva, “What Is the Mystery of the Trinity? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- William Burt Pope, “Attributes of the Absolute Essence of God Part 5: Observations”
- Does Matthew 7:24-27 Support Once Saved Always Saved?
- Richard Coords, “1 Kings 21:29”
- Roy Ingle, “Acts 14:2 – An Interesting Verse”
- David deSilva, “What Is the Mystery of the Trinity? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)”

Leave a Reply