In Brian Abasciano’s article Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner, Abasciano corrects Schreiner’s mistaken notion that corporate election denies any place to the individual. He argues that election is primarily corporate based on 1) the OT concept of election, 2) Paul’s statements about election to salvation and the fact that 3) first century culture was collectivist rather than individualistic. However, even though the primary focus of election is the community, the fact remains that the individual is elect secondarily as a member of the community. All this sets the stage for correctly understanding election in Romans 9 and answering Schreiner’s arguments. (link)
Home Author/Scholar Index: Arminian Abasciano, Brian Friday Files: Brian Abasciano’s “Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner”
Recent Posts
William Burt Pope on the Relation of the Attributes of God to the Divine Essence
, SEA, Comment Closed
Does Foreknowledge in Romans 8:29-30 Support Calvinism?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Donald Smith, “On Zimmerman’s ‘The Providential Usefulness of “Simple Foreknowledge”'”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Video: Part 2 of Assessing the Theological Framework of William L. Hess’ Book, “Crushing the Great Serpent”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “1 Samuel 3:11-14”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- William Burt Pope on the Relation of the Attributes of God to the Divine Essence
- Does Foreknowledge in Romans 8:29-30 Support Calvinism?
- Donald Smith, “On Zimmerman’s ‘The Providential Usefulness of “Simple Foreknowledge”'”
- Video: Part 2 of Assessing the Theological Framework of William L. Hess’ Book, “Crushing the Great Serpent”
- Richard Coords, “1 Samuel 3:11-14”

Leave a Reply