In Brian Abasciano’s article Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner, Abasciano corrects Schreiner’s mistaken notion that corporate election denies any place to the individual. He argues that election is primarily corporate based on 1) the OT concept of election, 2) Paul’s statements about election to salvation and the fact that 3) first century culture was collectivist rather than individualistic. However, even though the primary focus of election is the community, the fact remains that the individual is elect secondarily as a member of the community. All this sets the stage for correctly understanding election in Romans 9 and answering Schreiner’s arguments. (link)
Home Author/Scholar Index: Arminian Abasciano, Brian Friday Files: Brian Abasciano’s “Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner”
Recent Posts
William Burt Pope, “Divine Attributes Related to the Creature Part 3: Omnipresence and Omniscience”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “2 Kings 20:1-7”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Simon Peter Sutherland, “A 20th century revival of 17th century Tulip Mania”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “How Easy It Is to Swerve From the Faith”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Video: David Pallmann, “Introduction to Soteriology: Calvinism, Arminianism, and Molinism”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- William Burt Pope, “Divine Attributes Related to the Creature Part 3: Omnipresence and Omniscience”
- Richard Coords, “2 Kings 20:1-7”
- Simon Peter Sutherland, “A 20th century revival of 17th century Tulip Mania”
- Roy Ingle, “How Easy It Is to Swerve From the Faith”
- Video: David Pallmann, “Introduction to Soteriology: Calvinism, Arminianism, and Molinism”

Leave a Reply