In Brian Abasciano’s article Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner, Abasciano corrects Schreiner’s mistaken notion that corporate election denies any place to the individual. He argues that election is primarily corporate based on 1) the OT concept of election, 2) Paul’s statements about election to salvation and the fact that 3) first century culture was collectivist rather than individualistic. However, even though the primary focus of election is the community, the fact remains that the individual is elect secondarily as a member of the community. All this sets the stage for correctly understanding election in Romans 9 and answering Schreiner’s arguments. (link)
Home Author/Scholar Index: Arminian Abasciano, Brian Friday Files: Brian Abasciano’s “Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner”
Recent Posts
H. Wayne Johnson, “Disappointed with God’s Sovereignty? You May Need a Dose of Kingdom Eschatology”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “But I Want To Sin”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Video: David Pallmann, “A Case For Free Will”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “The Moral Attributes of God Part 2: Holiness and Love”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to John 6:37-40?
, SEA, Comment Closed
- H. Wayne Johnson, “Disappointed with God’s Sovereignty? You May Need a Dose of Kingdom Eschatology”
- Roy Ingle, “But I Want To Sin”
- Video: David Pallmann, “A Case For Free Will”
- William Burt Pope, “The Moral Attributes of God Part 2: Holiness and Love”
- Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to John 6:37-40?

Leave a Reply