In Brian Abasciano’s article Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner, Abasciano corrects Schreiner’s mistaken notion that corporate election denies any place to the individual. He argues that election is primarily corporate based on 1) the OT concept of election, 2) Paul’s statements about election to salvation and the fact that 3) first century culture was collectivist rather than individualistic. However, even though the primary focus of election is the community, the fact remains that the individual is elect secondarily as a member of the community. All this sets the stage for correctly understanding election in Romans 9 and answering Schreiner’s arguments. (link)
Home Author/Scholar Index: Arminian Abasciano, Brian Friday Files: Brian Abasciano’s “Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner”
Recent Posts
Brian Abasciano, “A Brief explanation of the Arminian View of Calling”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Does 1 John 3:7-10 Show That a Believer Cannot Abandon the Faith?
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “The Motive and the End of the Creation”
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine Volume 14 Issue 2 (Fall 1996)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Why Did the Son of God Become Human? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Brian Abasciano, “A Brief explanation of the Arminian View of Calling”
- Does 1 John 3:7-10 Show That a Believer Cannot Abandon the Faith?
- William Burt Pope, “The Motive and the End of the Creation”
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 14 Issue 2 (Fall 1996)
- Why Did the Son of God Become Human? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)

Leave a Reply