In Brian Abasciano’s article Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner, Abasciano corrects Schreiner’s mistaken notion that corporate election denies any place to the individual. He argues that election is primarily corporate based on 1) the OT concept of election, 2) Paul’s statements about election to salvation and the fact that 3) first century culture was collectivist rather than individualistic. However, even though the primary focus of election is the community, the fact remains that the individual is elect secondarily as a member of the community. All this sets the stage for correctly understanding election in Romans 9 and answering Schreiner’s arguments. (link)
Home Author/Scholar Index: Arminian Abasciano, Brian Friday Files: Brian Abasciano’s “Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner”
Recent Posts
The Arminian Magazine Volume 12 Issue 1 (Spring 1994)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “Whom Did Jesus Come to Call?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Britt Mooney, “Why Does a Good God Allow Suffering?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Matt Pinson, “What I Like (and Don’t Like) about Non-Penal-Satisfaction Theories of Atonement”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 4: Materialistic Atheism”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 12 Issue 1 (Spring 1994)
- Roy Ingle, “Whom Did Jesus Come to Call?”
- Britt Mooney, “Why Does a Good God Allow Suffering?”
- Matt Pinson, “What I Like (and Don’t Like) about Non-Penal-Satisfaction Theories of Atonement”
- William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 4: Materialistic Atheism”

Leave a Reply