In Brian Abasciano’s article Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner, Abasciano corrects Schreiner’s mistaken notion that corporate election denies any place to the individual. He argues that election is primarily corporate based on 1) the OT concept of election, 2) Paul’s statements about election to salvation and the fact that 3) first century culture was collectivist rather than individualistic. However, even though the primary focus of election is the community, the fact remains that the individual is elect secondarily as a member of the community. All this sets the stage for correctly understanding election in Romans 9 and answering Schreiner’s arguments. (link)
Home Author/Scholar Index: Arminian Abasciano, Brian Friday Files: Brian Abasciano’s “Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner”
Recent Posts
Video: Discussion with Dr. Alan Rhoda on Open Theism
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “Theology Should Ignite Passion (But It Often Doesn’t)”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Ben Henshaw, “Refuting Social Media Calvinism #3: Faith in Christ Means We Depend on Ourselves?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Mark K. Olson, “John Wesley on Animal Redemption”
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine Volume 5 (Fall 1984)
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Video: Discussion with Dr. Alan Rhoda on Open Theism
- Roy Ingle, “Theology Should Ignite Passion (But It Often Doesn’t)”
- Ben Henshaw, “Refuting Social Media Calvinism #3: Faith in Christ Means We Depend on Ourselves?”
- Mark K. Olson, “John Wesley on Animal Redemption”
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 5 (Fall 1984)

Leave a Reply