In Brian Abasciano’s article Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner, Abasciano corrects Schreiner’s mistaken notion that corporate election denies any place to the individual. He argues that election is primarily corporate based on 1) the OT concept of election, 2) Paul’s statements about election to salvation and the fact that 3) first century culture was collectivist rather than individualistic. However, even though the primary focus of election is the community, the fact remains that the individual is elect secondarily as a member of the community. All this sets the stage for correctly understanding election in Romans 9 and answering Schreiner’s arguments. (link)
Home Author/Scholar Index: Arminian Abasciano, Brian Friday Files: Brian Abasciano’s “Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner”
Recent Posts
Mark K. Olson, “John Wesley’s Perspective on… Voting, Sunday Observance, Preaching Politics, Culture, Protestantism, Religious Profession”
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine Spring 1980 Edition
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “The Moral Attributes of God Part 6: Grace and Its Related Attributes”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to Ephesians 1:13-14 (Sealing)?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “Nehemiah 9:28-31”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Mark K. Olson, “John Wesley’s Perspective on… Voting, Sunday Observance, Preaching Politics, Culture, Protestantism, Religious Profession”
- The Arminian Magazine Spring 1980 Edition
- William Burt Pope, “The Moral Attributes of God Part 6: Grace and Its Related Attributes”
- Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to Ephesians 1:13-14 (Sealing)?
- Richard Coords, “Nehemiah 9:28-31”

Leave a Reply