Please click on the link to view Dr. David Allen’s Official Public Response on why He Won’t Debate James White on Limited Atonement. It echoes comments SEA President Brian Abasciano has made in written interaction with White in the past, finding his responses “not respectful or charitable dialogue as befitting scholarly discussion or exchange with a brother in Christ.” Such comments can be found in these 2 articles: Brian Abasciano, “A Reply to James White Concerning His Faulty Treatment of the Greek and Context of Acts 13:48” (the quotation above is from the first paragraph of this article) and Brian Abasciano, “A Reply to James White on 1 John 5:1 and the Order of Faith and Regeneration” (see especially numbered point 7 of that article).
Home Author/Scholar Index: Arminian Abasciano, Brian Dr. David Allen’s Official Public Response on Why He Won’t Debate James White on Limited Atonement
Recent Posts
Matt Pinson, “What I Like (and Don’t Like) about Non-Penal-Satisfaction Theories of Atonement”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 4: Materialistic Atheism”
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine Volume 11 Issue 2 (Fall 1993)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Is the Son God? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
, SEA, Comment Closed
How Do Arminians Answer Calvinist Appeal to 1 John 3:7-10 to Support That Believers Cannot Abandon the Faith?
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Matt Pinson, “What I Like (and Don’t Like) about Non-Penal-Satisfaction Theories of Atonement”
- William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 4: Materialistic Atheism”
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 11 Issue 2 (Fall 1993)
- Is the Son God? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
- How Do Arminians Answer Calvinist Appeal to 1 John 3:7-10 to Support That Believers Cannot Abandon the Faith?
