- Andrew, of Beyond Calvinism, posts: “A Concise Description of Prevenient Grace from a Surprising Source (Spoiler: It’s John MacArthur).”
- Adam Omelianchuk writes: “My Problem with the ‘Is-Ought’ Problem.”
- Roy Ingle, of Arminian Today, blogs about “The Conditional Texts.”
- Kingswood Hart, of The Predestination Station, is blogging through Romans: “Structure of Romans 1:16-4:25.”
- Asbury’s Seedbed highlights: “Aldersgate and the Role of Salvation,” “Why is Systematic and Wesleyan Theology Important?” and “Seeing Beyond Inward versus Outward Focus.”
- Mike Barlotta, of Dead Heroes Don’t Save, is “Blogging through Grace for All: Evil is a Tough Pill to Swallow When One Holds to Theological Determinism.”
- Traditional Southern Baptists at SBC Today present: “Elected, And I Wasn’t Even Running,” a post that challenges the novel theory of the Calvinist doctrine of unconditional election.
- Roger Olson responds to Mark Jones’ Reformation21 piece challenging Arminius’ doctrine of justification.
- The Society of Evangelical Arminians also responds to Mark Jones’ inaccurate piece: “Jacob Arminius’ Reformed Views on Justification,” as well as presenting Dr. Nathan A. Finn’s “Is Synergism Necessarily Semi-Pelagian?” and also Charles Edward White’s “‘Ye Need Not One Be Left Behind / For God Hath Bidden All Mankind”: Charles Wesley’s Response to the Doctrine of Limited Atonement.”
- Dr. Dale Wayman, of IRONSTRIKES, emphasizes: “Turning from God,” “Making Man Friends,” and “A Dangerous Man.”
- William Birch, of I, Jacob Arminius, posts about the forthcoming book, “Jacob Arminius: The Man from Ouderwater,” as well as writes the posts “The Loss of Arminius in Wesleyan-Arminian Theology,” and “Neglecting Arminius.”
- Leighton Flowers, of Soteriology 101, writes: “Calvinism’s Inconsistency Revealed.”
- Steve Sewell, of The Arminian Bible Commentary, presents: “Incompatibility of Calvinism and Fulfillment Theology [Explained].”
