This is Cottrell’s response to Thomas Talbott’s essay, “UNIVERSAL RECONCILIATION AND THE INCLUSIVE NATURE OF ELECTION”, both in Perspectives on Election: Five Views (Ed. Chad Owen Brand; Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 2006). Click on the attachment: Cottrell. Response to Talbott on Universal Reconciliation and the Inclusive Nature of Election
Home Author/Scholar Index: Other or unknown Cottrell, Jack Jack W. Cottrell, Response to Universalist Thomas Talbott’s “Universal Reconciliation and the Inclusive Nature of Election”
Recent Posts
Richard Coords, “2 Samuel 24:11-14”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “A Summary of an Arminian View on the Depravity of Man”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “Attributes of the Absolute Essence of God Part 3: Self-Sufficiency”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Evan Minton, “R. C. Sproul’s Failed Attempt To Explain Matthew 23:37-38”
, SEA, Comment Closed
David deSilva, “Who is God? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Richard Coords, “2 Samuel 24:11-14”
- Roy Ingle, “A Summary of an Arminian View on the Depravity of Man”
- William Burt Pope, “Attributes of the Absolute Essence of God Part 3: Self-Sufficiency”
- Evan Minton, “R. C. Sproul’s Failed Attempt To Explain Matthew 23:37-38”
- David deSilva, “Who is God? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)”
