Tom McCall and Keith Stanglin’s article S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK reviews Baugh’s arguments that the meaning of foreknowledge in the NT renders “impossible” the “Arminian notion of ‘foreseen faith’. Tom and Keith do a good job pointing out that Baugh assumes the irreconcilability of foreknowledge and free will from the outset (without arguing the point) and also that Baugh’s view is contrary to the teachings of the early church.
Home Author/Scholar Index: Calvinist Baugh. S. M. Friday Files: S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK
Recent Posts
Mark K. Olson, “John Wesley’s Perspective on… Voting, Sunday Observance, Preaching Politics, Culture, Protestantism, Religious Profession”
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine Spring 1980 Edition
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “The Moral Attributes of God Part 6: Grace and Its Related Attributes”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to Ephesians 1:13-14 (Sealing)?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “Nehemiah 9:28-31”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Mark K. Olson, “John Wesley’s Perspective on… Voting, Sunday Observance, Preaching Politics, Culture, Protestantism, Religious Profession”
- The Arminian Magazine Spring 1980 Edition
- William Burt Pope, “The Moral Attributes of God Part 6: Grace and Its Related Attributes”
- Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to Ephesians 1:13-14 (Sealing)?
- Richard Coords, “Nehemiah 9:28-31”

Leave a Reply