Tom McCall and Keith Stanglin’s article S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK reviews Baugh’s arguments that the meaning of foreknowledge in the NT renders “impossible” the “Arminian notion of ‘foreseen faith’. Tom and Keith do a good job pointing out that Baugh assumes the irreconcilability of foreknowledge and free will from the outset (without arguing the point) and also that Baugh’s view is contrary to the teachings of the early church.
Home Author/Scholar Index: Calvinist Baugh. S. M. Friday Files: S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK
Recent Posts
The Arminian Magazine Volume 3 (Spring 1982)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “Job 2:3”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Mark K. Olson, “Wesley’s Standard Sermons with Annotations”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “Book Review: The Scofield Bible – Its History and Impact on the Evangelical Church”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “The Moral Attributes of God Part 8: The Union of Holiness, Righteousness, and Love in the Atonement as Administered in the Gospel”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 3 (Spring 1982)
- Richard Coords, “Job 2:3”
- Mark K. Olson, “Wesley’s Standard Sermons with Annotations”
- Roy Ingle, “Book Review: The Scofield Bible – Its History and Impact on the Evangelical Church”
- William Burt Pope, “The Moral Attributes of God Part 8: The Union of Holiness, Righteousness, and Love in the Atonement as Administered in the Gospel”

Leave a Reply