Tom McCall and Keith Stanglin’s article S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK reviews Baugh’s arguments that the meaning of foreknowledge in the NT renders “impossible” the “Arminian notion of ‘foreseen faith’. Tom and Keith do a good job pointing out that Baugh assumes the irreconcilability of foreknowledge and free will from the outset (without arguing the point) and also that Baugh’s view is contrary to the teachings of the early church.
Home Author/Scholar Index: Calvinist Baugh. S. M. Friday Files: S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK
Recent Posts
Video: Discussion with Dr. Alan Rhoda on Open Theism
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “Theology Should Ignite Passion (But It Often Doesn’t)”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Ben Henshaw, “Refuting Social Media Calvinism #3: Faith in Christ Means We Depend on Ourselves?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Mark K. Olson, “John Wesley on Animal Redemption”
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine Volume 5 (Fall 1984)
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Video: Discussion with Dr. Alan Rhoda on Open Theism
- Roy Ingle, “Theology Should Ignite Passion (But It Often Doesn’t)”
- Ben Henshaw, “Refuting Social Media Calvinism #3: Faith in Christ Means We Depend on Ourselves?”
- Mark K. Olson, “John Wesley on Animal Redemption”
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 5 (Fall 1984)

Leave a Reply