Tom McCall and Keith Stanglin’s article S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK reviews Baugh’s arguments that the meaning of foreknowledge in the NT renders “impossible” the “Arminian notion of ‘foreseen faith’. Tom and Keith do a good job pointing out that Baugh assumes the irreconcilability of foreknowledge and free will from the outset (without arguing the point) and also that Baugh’s view is contrary to the teachings of the early church.
Home Author/Scholar Index: Calvinist Baugh. S. M. Friday Files: S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK
Recent Posts
The Arminian Magazine Volume 10 (Spring 1991)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Do You Believe in Jesus Christ? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to Romans 5:9-11?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “Psalm 95:7-11”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 1: Pantheism”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 10 (Spring 1991)
- Do You Believe in Jesus Christ? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
- Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to Romans 5:9-11?
- Richard Coords, “Psalm 95:7-11”
- William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 1: Pantheism”

Leave a Reply