Tom McCall and Keith Stanglin’s article S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK reviews Baugh’s arguments that the meaning of foreknowledge in the NT renders “impossible” the “Arminian notion of ‘foreseen faith’. Tom and Keith do a good job pointing out that Baugh assumes the irreconcilability of foreknowledge and free will from the outset (without arguing the point) and also that Baugh’s view is contrary to the teachings of the early church.
Home Author/Scholar Index: Calvinist Baugh. S. M. Friday Files: S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK
Recent Posts
Richard Coords, “2 Samuel 24:1”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Travis Stevick, “The Wesleyan Understanding of Salvation, Part 1: Prevenient/Preventing Grace”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Video: Dalton Blackman on “What Is Reformed Arminianism?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “Be Wary of Not Resisting Sin”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “Attributes of the Absolute Essence of God Part 1: Spirituality, Infinity, and Immensity”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Richard Coords, “2 Samuel 24:1”
- Travis Stevick, “The Wesleyan Understanding of Salvation, Part 1: Prevenient/Preventing Grace”
- Video: Dalton Blackman on “What Is Reformed Arminianism?”
- Roy Ingle, “Be Wary of Not Resisting Sin”
- William Burt Pope, “Attributes of the Absolute Essence of God Part 1: Spirituality, Infinity, and Immensity”

Leave a Reply