Tom McCall and Keith Stanglin’s article S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK reviews Baugh’s arguments that the meaning of foreknowledge in the NT renders “impossible” the “Arminian notion of ‘foreseen faith’. Tom and Keith do a good job pointing out that Baugh assumes the irreconcilability of foreknowledge and free will from the outset (without arguing the point) and also that Baugh’s view is contrary to the teachings of the early church.
Home Author/Scholar Index: Calvinist Baugh. S. M. Friday Files: S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK
Recent Posts
William Burt Pope on the Relation of the Attributes of God to the Divine Essence
, SEA, Comment Closed
Does Foreknowledge in Romans 8:29-30 Support Calvinism?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Donald Smith, “On Zimmerman’s ‘The Providential Usefulness of “Simple Foreknowledge”'”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Video: Part 2 of Assessing the Theological Framework of William L. Hess’ Book, “Crushing the Great Serpent”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “1 Samuel 3:11-14”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- William Burt Pope on the Relation of the Attributes of God to the Divine Essence
- Does Foreknowledge in Romans 8:29-30 Support Calvinism?
- Donald Smith, “On Zimmerman’s ‘The Providential Usefulness of “Simple Foreknowledge”'”
- Video: Part 2 of Assessing the Theological Framework of William L. Hess’ Book, “Crushing the Great Serpent”
- Richard Coords, “1 Samuel 3:11-14”

Leave a Reply