Tom McCall and Keith Stanglin’s article S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK reviews Baugh’s arguments that the meaning of foreknowledge in the NT renders “impossible” the “Arminian notion of ‘foreseen faith’. Tom and Keith do a good job pointing out that Baugh assumes the irreconcilability of foreknowledge and free will from the outset (without arguing the point) and also that Baugh’s view is contrary to the teachings of the early church.
Home Author/Scholar Index: Calvinist Baugh. S. M. Friday Files: S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK
Recent Posts
How Do You Interpret Isaiah 45:7?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Video: David Pallmann, “A Critique of Eternal Security Part 1: The Case For Eternal Security Considered”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “Divine Attributes Related to the Creature Part 5: The Goodness of God”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “1 Chronicles 28:9”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Simon Peter Sutherland, “Why Are False Teachers ‘Twice Dead’ in Jude?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- How Do You Interpret Isaiah 45:7?
- Video: David Pallmann, “A Critique of Eternal Security Part 1: The Case For Eternal Security Considered”
- William Burt Pope, “Divine Attributes Related to the Creature Part 5: The Goodness of God”
- Richard Coords, “1 Chronicles 28:9”
- Simon Peter Sutherland, “Why Are False Teachers ‘Twice Dead’ in Jude?”

Leave a Reply