Tom McCall and Keith Stanglin’s article S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK reviews Baugh’s arguments that the meaning of foreknowledge in the NT renders “impossible” the “Arminian notion of ‘foreseen faith’. Tom and Keith do a good job pointing out that Baugh assumes the irreconcilability of foreknowledge and free will from the outset (without arguing the point) and also that Baugh’s view is contrary to the teachings of the early church.
Home Author/Scholar Index: Calvinist Baugh. S. M. Friday Files: S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK
Recent Posts
Richard Coords, “1 Kings 21:29”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “Acts 14:2 – An Interesting Verse”
, SEA, Comment Closed
David deSilva, “What Is the Mystery of the Trinity? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “Attributes of the Absolute Essence of God Part 4: Immutability and Perfection”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Mark K. Olson on John Wesley’s Sermon, “Salvation by Faith”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Richard Coords, “1 Kings 21:29”
- Roy Ingle, “Acts 14:2 – An Interesting Verse”
- David deSilva, “What Is the Mystery of the Trinity? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)”
- William Burt Pope, “Attributes of the Absolute Essence of God Part 4: Immutability and Perfection”
- Mark K. Olson on John Wesley’s Sermon, “Salvation by Faith”

Leave a Reply