Jerry McCant’s Interpretation of Romans 5-8 is in response to a request to provide a Wesleyan view of Romans 6-8. He expands the scope to cover chapter 5, since he finds a close connection between 5 and 6. While I personally didn’t like McCant’s not finding original sin in Romans 5 or his saying Paul’s analogies in Romans 6 & 7 have problems, McCant does make some interesting points. Overall, McCant does not find a Wesleyan ‘second work of grace’ in the passage.
Home Arminianism Friday Files: McCant’s A Wesleyan Interpretation of Romans 5-8
Recent Posts
Roy Ingle, “When Does Debating Theology Become Wrong?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine 44 Issue 2 (Fall 2026)
, SEA, Comment Closed
How Did the Son of God Become Human? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Eric Landstrom, “Provisionism: Forgetting What Shouldn’t Be Forgotten, Part II: A Defense of Inward Grace”
, Eric Landstrom, Comment Closed
If Jesus Died for the Sins of All, How Can It Be that Not All Are Saved?
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Roy Ingle, “When Does Debating Theology Become Wrong?”
- The Arminian Magazine 44 Issue 2 (Fall 2026)
- How Did the Son of God Become Human? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
- Eric Landstrom, “Provisionism: Forgetting What Shouldn’t Be Forgotten, Part II: A Defense of Inward Grace”
- If Jesus Died for the Sins of All, How Can It Be that Not All Are Saved?

Leave a Reply