Jerry McCant’s Interpretation of Romans 5-8 is in response to a request to provide a Wesleyan view of Romans 6-8. He expands the scope to cover chapter 5, since he finds a close connection between 5 and 6. While I personally didn’t like McCant’s not finding original sin in Romans 5 or his saying Paul’s analogies in Romans 6 & 7 have problems, McCant does make some interesting points. Overall, McCant does not find a Wesleyan ‘second work of grace’ in the passage.
Home Arminianism Friday Files: McCant’s A Wesleyan Interpretation of Romans 5-8
Recent Posts
The Arminian Magazine Volume 12 Issue 1 (Spring 1994)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “Whom Did Jesus Come to Call?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Britt Mooney, “Why Does a Good God Allow Suffering?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Matt Pinson, “What I Like (and Don’t Like) about Non-Penal-Satisfaction Theories of Atonement”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 4: Materialistic Atheism”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 12 Issue 1 (Spring 1994)
- Roy Ingle, “Whom Did Jesus Come to Call?”
- Britt Mooney, “Why Does a Good God Allow Suffering?”
- Matt Pinson, “What I Like (and Don’t Like) about Non-Penal-Satisfaction Theories of Atonement”
- William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 4: Materialistic Atheism”

Leave a Reply