Jerry McCant’s Interpretation of Romans 5-8 is in response to a request to provide a Wesleyan view of Romans 6-8. He expands the scope to cover chapter 5, since he finds a close connection between 5 and 6. While I personally didn’t like McCant’s not finding original sin in Romans 5 or his saying Paul’s analogies in Romans 6 & 7 have problems, McCant does make some interesting points. Overall, McCant does not find a Wesleyan ‘second work of grace’ in the passage.
Home Arminianism Friday Files: McCant’s A Wesleyan Interpretation of Romans 5-8
Recent Posts
Brian Abasciano, “A Brief explanation of the Arminian View of Calling”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Does 1 John 3:7-10 Show That a Believer Cannot Abandon the Faith?
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “The Motive and the End of the Creation”
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine Volume 14 Issue 2 (Fall 1996)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Why Did the Son of God Become Human? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Brian Abasciano, “A Brief explanation of the Arminian View of Calling”
- Does 1 John 3:7-10 Show That a Believer Cannot Abandon the Faith?
- William Burt Pope, “The Motive and the End of the Creation”
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 14 Issue 2 (Fall 1996)
- Why Did the Son of God Become Human? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)

Leave a Reply