Jerry McCant’s Interpretation of Romans 5-8 is in response to a request to provide a Wesleyan view of Romans 6-8. He expands the scope to cover chapter 5, since he finds a close connection between 5 and 6. While I personally didn’t like McCant’s not finding original sin in Romans 5 or his saying Paul’s analogies in Romans 6 & 7 have problems, McCant does make some interesting points. Overall, McCant does not find a Wesleyan ‘second work of grace’ in the passage.
Home Arminianism Friday Files: McCant’s A Wesleyan Interpretation of Romans 5-8
Recent Posts
Roy Ingle, “But I Want To Sin”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Video: David Pallmann, “A Case For Free Will”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “The Moral Attributes of God Part 2: Holiness and Love”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to John 6:37-40?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to John 5:24?
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Roy Ingle, “But I Want To Sin”
- Video: David Pallmann, “A Case For Free Will”
- William Burt Pope, “The Moral Attributes of God Part 2: Holiness and Love”
- Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to John 6:37-40?
- Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to John 5:24?

Leave a Reply