Jerry McCant’s Interpretation of Romans 5-8 is in response to a request to provide a Wesleyan view of Romans 6-8. He expands the scope to cover chapter 5, since he finds a close connection between 5 and 6. While I personally didn’t like McCant’s not finding original sin in Romans 5 or his saying Paul’s analogies in Romans 6 & 7 have problems, McCant does make some interesting points. Overall, McCant does not find a Wesleyan ‘second work of grace’ in the passage.
Home Arminianism Friday Files: McCant’s A Wesleyan Interpretation of Romans 5-8
Recent Posts
William Burt Pope, “Divine Attributes Related to the Creature Part 5: The Goodness of God”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “1 Chronicles 28:9”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Simon Peter Sutherland, “Why Are False Teachers ‘Twice Dead’ in Jude?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
H. Wayne Johnson, “The Good News of Incorporative Election in Ephesians 1”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Video: David Pallmann, “A Critique of Limited (Definite) Atonement”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- William Burt Pope, “Divine Attributes Related to the Creature Part 5: The Goodness of God”
- Richard Coords, “1 Chronicles 28:9”
- Simon Peter Sutherland, “Why Are False Teachers ‘Twice Dead’ in Jude?”
- H. Wayne Johnson, “The Good News of Incorporative Election in Ephesians 1”
- Video: David Pallmann, “A Critique of Limited (Definite) Atonement”

Leave a Reply