In Martin Glynn’s critique of the Articles of the Remonstrants, he provides a brief and helpful historical introduction and then dissects each of the five articles. Glynn notes the two surprises in the pile: article 3 is an unqualified expression of Total Depravity and in article 5 the Remonstrants are undecided on the issue of apostasy and simply say they need to research it more in Scripture. (link)
Home Arminianism Friday Files: Martin Glynn
Recent Posts
The Arminian Magazine Volume 12 Issue 1 (Spring 1994)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “Whom Did Jesus Come to Call?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Britt Mooney, “Why Does a Good God Allow Suffering?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Matt Pinson, “What I Like (and Don’t Like) about Non-Penal-Satisfaction Theories of Atonement”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 4: Materialistic Atheism”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 12 Issue 1 (Spring 1994)
- Roy Ingle, “Whom Did Jesus Come to Call?”
- Britt Mooney, “Why Does a Good God Allow Suffering?”
- Matt Pinson, “What I Like (and Don’t Like) about Non-Penal-Satisfaction Theories of Atonement”
- William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 4: Materialistic Atheism”

Leave a Reply