In Daniel Whedon’s Comentary on Romans 9, he argues that Paul’s quotations of the old testament support the Arminian view of the passage. In some ways, I found Whedon to be a prototype of more recent Arminian explanations of the passage. Specifically, his digging into the context of “I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy” in Exodus 32-33 was a big step in the right direction. Whedon explains the verses and then refutes Barnes’ (a Calvinist) view. He notes the Calvinist interpretation of defending God’s justice is really a “might makes right” kind of view. He objects: “Power increased infinitely cannot change right. A creature can be supposedly wronged by even an infinite being. The predesinarian interpretation makes Paul pretend to give a reason, but really resorts to force, and seeks to frighten his opponents out of reasoning.”
Home Arminianism Friday Files: Daniel Whedon’s Comentary on Romans 9
Recent Posts
Eric Landstrom, “Is Resistible Grace Effectual?”
, Eric Landstrom, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “When Does Debating Theology Become Wrong?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine 44 Issue 2 (Fall 2026)
, SEA, Comment Closed
How Did the Son of God Become Human? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Eric Landstrom, “Provisionism: Forgetting What Shouldn’t Be Forgotten, Part II: A Defense of Inward Grace”
, Eric Landstrom, Comment Closed
- Eric Landstrom, “Is Resistible Grace Effectual?”
- Roy Ingle, “When Does Debating Theology Become Wrong?”
- The Arminian Magazine 44 Issue 2 (Fall 2026)
- How Did the Son of God Become Human? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
- Eric Landstrom, “Provisionism: Forgetting What Shouldn’t Be Forgotten, Part II: A Defense of Inward Grace”

Leave a Reply