In Daniel Whedon’s Comentary on Romans 9, he argues that Paul’s quotations of the old testament support the Arminian view of the passage. In some ways, I found Whedon to be a prototype of more recent Arminian explanations of the passage. Specifically, his digging into the context of “I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy” in Exodus 32-33 was a big step in the right direction. Whedon explains the verses and then refutes Barnes’ (a Calvinist) view. He notes the Calvinist interpretation of defending God’s justice is really a “might makes right” kind of view. He objects: “Power increased infinitely cannot change right. A creature can be supposedly wronged by even an infinite being. The predesinarian interpretation makes Paul pretend to give a reason, but really resorts to force, and seeks to frighten his opponents out of reasoning.”
Home Arminianism Friday Files: Daniel Whedon’s Comentary on Romans 9
Recent Posts
Roy Ingle, “But I Want To Sin”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Video: David Pallmann, “A Case For Free Will”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “The Moral Attributes of God Part 2: Holiness and Love”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to John 6:37-40?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to John 5:24?
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Roy Ingle, “But I Want To Sin”
- Video: David Pallmann, “A Case For Free Will”
- William Burt Pope, “The Moral Attributes of God Part 2: Holiness and Love”
- Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to John 6:37-40?
- Regarding Eternal Security, How Do You Briefly Respond to Calvinist Appeal to John 5:24?

Leave a Reply