In Daniel Whedon’s Comentary on Romans 9, he argues that Paul’s quotations of the old testament support the Arminian view of the passage. In some ways, I found Whedon to be a prototype of more recent Arminian explanations of the passage. Specifically, his digging into the context of “I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy” in Exodus 32-33 was a big step in the right direction. Whedon explains the verses and then refutes Barnes’ (a Calvinist) view. He notes the Calvinist interpretation of defending God’s justice is really a “might makes right” kind of view. He objects: “Power increased infinitely cannot change right. A creature can be supposedly wronged by even an infinite being. The predesinarian interpretation makes Paul pretend to give a reason, but really resorts to force, and seeks to frighten his opponents out of reasoning.”
Home Arminianism Friday Files: Daniel Whedon’s Comentary on Romans 9
Recent Posts
Video: Discussion with Dr. Alan Rhoda on Open Theism
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “Theology Should Ignite Passion (But It Often Doesn’t)”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Ben Henshaw, “Refuting Social Media Calvinism #3: Faith in Christ Means We Depend on Ourselves?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Mark K. Olson, “John Wesley on Animal Redemption”
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine Volume 5 (Fall 1984)
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Video: Discussion with Dr. Alan Rhoda on Open Theism
- Roy Ingle, “Theology Should Ignite Passion (But It Often Doesn’t)”
- Ben Henshaw, “Refuting Social Media Calvinism #3: Faith in Christ Means We Depend on Ourselves?”
- Mark K. Olson, “John Wesley on Animal Redemption”
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 5 (Fall 1984)

Leave a Reply