In Daniel Whedon’s Comentary on Romans 9, he argues that Paul’s quotations of the old testament support the Arminian view of the passage. In some ways, I found Whedon to be a prototype of more recent Arminian explanations of the passage. Specifically, his digging into the context of “I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy” in Exodus 32-33 was a big step in the right direction. Whedon explains the verses and then refutes Barnes’ (a Calvinist) view. He notes the Calvinist interpretation of defending God’s justice is really a “might makes right” kind of view. He objects: “Power increased infinitely cannot change right. A creature can be supposedly wronged by even an infinite being. The predesinarian interpretation makes Paul pretend to give a reason, but really resorts to force, and seeks to frighten his opponents out of reasoning.”
Home Arminianism Friday Files: Daniel Whedon’s Comentary on Romans 9
Recent Posts
If Jesus Died for All to Save Them Yet Not All Are Saved, Does That Mean He Failed or That He Requires the Lost to Pay for Sins Already Paid For?
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope on the Creation and Nature of Man
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine 17 Issue 1 (Spring 1999)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Who Is Jesus Christ? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “Proverbs 11:30”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- If Jesus Died for All to Save Them Yet Not All Are Saved, Does That Mean He Failed or That He Requires the Lost to Pay for Sins Already Paid For?
- William Burt Pope on the Creation and Nature of Man
- The Arminian Magazine 17 Issue 1 (Spring 1999)
- Who Is Jesus Christ? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
- Richard Coords, “Proverbs 11:30”

Leave a Reply