In Daniel Whedon’s Comentary on Romans 9, he argues that Paul’s quotations of the old testament support the Arminian view of the passage. In some ways, I found Whedon to be a prototype of more recent Arminian explanations of the passage. Specifically, his digging into the context of “I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy” in Exodus 32-33 was a big step in the right direction. Whedon explains the verses and then refutes Barnes’ (a Calvinist) view. He notes the Calvinist interpretation of defending God’s justice is really a “might makes right” kind of view. He objects: “Power increased infinitely cannot change right. A creature can be supposedly wronged by even an infinite being. The predesinarian interpretation makes Paul pretend to give a reason, but really resorts to force, and seeks to frighten his opponents out of reasoning.”
Home Arminianism Friday Files: Daniel Whedon’s Comentary on Romans 9
Recent Posts
Mark K. Olson on John Wesley’s Sermon, “Salvation by Faith”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Can You Direct Me to Any Information on the Biblical Definitions of “Choose, Chose and Chosen” and Answer Calvinistic Claims in These Passages?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “2 Samuel 24:11-14”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “A Summary of an Arminian View on the Depravity of Man”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “Attributes of the Absolute Essence of God Part 3: Self-Sufficiency”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Mark K. Olson on John Wesley’s Sermon, “Salvation by Faith”
- Can You Direct Me to Any Information on the Biblical Definitions of “Choose, Chose and Chosen” and Answer Calvinistic Claims in These Passages?
- Richard Coords, “2 Samuel 24:11-14”
- Roy Ingle, “A Summary of an Arminian View on the Depravity of Man”
- William Burt Pope, “Attributes of the Absolute Essence of God Part 3: Self-Sufficiency”

Leave a Reply