In Daniel Whedon’s Comentary on Romans 9, he argues that Paul’s quotations of the old testament support the Arminian view of the passage. In some ways, I found Whedon to be a prototype of more recent Arminian explanations of the passage. Specifically, his digging into the context of “I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy” in Exodus 32-33 was a big step in the right direction. Whedon explains the verses and then refutes Barnes’ (a Calvinist) view. He notes the Calvinist interpretation of defending God’s justice is really a “might makes right” kind of view. He objects: “Power increased infinitely cannot change right. A creature can be supposedly wronged by even an infinite being. The predesinarian interpretation makes Paul pretend to give a reason, but really resorts to force, and seeks to frighten his opponents out of reasoning.”
Home Arminianism Friday Files: Daniel Whedon’s Comentary on Romans 9
Recent Posts
William Burt Pope, “Divine Attributes Related to the Creature Part 5: The Goodness of God”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “1 Chronicles 28:9”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Simon Peter Sutherland, “Why Are False Teachers ‘Twice Dead’ in Jude?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
H. Wayne Johnson, “The Good News of Incorporative Election in Ephesians 1”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Video: David Pallmann, “A Critique of Limited (Definite) Atonement”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- William Burt Pope, “Divine Attributes Related to the Creature Part 5: The Goodness of God”
- Richard Coords, “1 Chronicles 28:9”
- Simon Peter Sutherland, “Why Are False Teachers ‘Twice Dead’ in Jude?”
- H. Wayne Johnson, “The Good News of Incorporative Election in Ephesians 1”
- Video: David Pallmann, “A Critique of Limited (Definite) Atonement”

Leave a Reply