Please click on the link to read John Mark Hicks’ review of Jacob Arminius: Theologian of Grace, by Keith D. Stanglin and Thomas H. McCall. New York: Oxford University Press (2012): Review: Keith D. Stanglin…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ade43/ade43b3665f5fef03d60d1f2446de81fb6750dd3" alt=""
, AndrewH , Comment Closed
Please click on the link to read John Mark Hicks’ review of Jacob Arminius: Theologian of Grace, by Keith D. Stanglin and Thomas H. McCall. New York: Oxford University Press (2012): Review: Keith D. Stanglin…
, AndrewH , Comment Closed
Please click on the link to read John Mark Hicks’ review of Keith D. Stanglin. Arminius on the Assurance of Salvation: The Context, Roots, and Shape of the Leiden Debate, 1603-1609. Brill’s Series in Church…
, , Comment Closed
There exists a false charge that Arminius’ theology, when consistently maintained, renders one an Open Theist. This charge is merely a rhetorical one, synonymous with the insistence that the only consistent Calvinism is hyper-Calvinism, or…
, SEA , Comment Closed
A version of this article has appeared in Trinity Journal 33 (2012) 3-18. Please click on the link to view John Mark Hicks, “Classic Arminianism and Open Theism: A Substantial Difference in Their Theologies of Providence”.
, SEA , Comment Closed
This article originally appeared in the Evangelical Journal 9 (1991) 27-39, and was taken from the website of John Mark Hicks, specifically this page: http://johnmarkhicks.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/righteousness-of-saving-faith.doc. Please click on the attachment to view John Mark Hicks,…
, SEA, Comment Closed
, SEA, Comment Closed
, AndrewH, Comment Closed
, SEA, Comment Closed
, SEA, Comment Closed