This is an excerpt from Brian Abasciano, “Paul’s Use of the Old Testament in Romans 9.1-9: An Intertextual and Theological Exegesis” (Ph.D. thesis; University of Aberdeen, 2004). This doctoral thesis is available in full here at our site, and has been revised and published under the same title. This excerpt explains how the biblical concept of calling is not in line with the Calvinistic view of effectual calling, but actually supports Arminian theology. Click on the attachment to view Abasciano’s treatment of calling: Abasciano on calling. Page numbers and footnote numbers differ from the original.
Recent Posts
William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 5: Atheism or Antitheism”
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine Volume 12 Issue 1 (Spring 1994)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “Whom Did Jesus Come to Call?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Britt Mooney, “Why Does a Good God Allow Suffering?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Matt Pinson, “What I Like (and Don’t Like) about Non-Penal-Satisfaction Theories of Atonement”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 5: Atheism or Antitheism”
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 12 Issue 1 (Spring 1994)
- Roy Ingle, “Whom Did Jesus Come to Call?”
- Britt Mooney, “Why Does a Good God Allow Suffering?”
- Matt Pinson, “What I Like (and Don’t Like) about Non-Penal-Satisfaction Theories of Atonement”
