This is an excerpt from Brian Abasciano, “Paul’s Use of the Old Testament in Romans 9.1-9: An Intertextual and Theological Exegesis” (Ph.D. thesis; University of Aberdeen, 2004). This doctoral thesis is available in full here at our site, and has been revised and published under the same title. This excerpt explains how the biblical concept of calling is not in line with the Calvinistic view of effectual calling, but actually supports Arminian theology. Click on the attachment to view Abasciano’s treatment of calling: Abasciano on calling. Page numbers and footnote numbers differ from the original.
Recent Posts
How Do You Interpret Isaiah 45:7?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Video: David Pallmann, “A Critique of Eternal Security Part 1: The Case For Eternal Security Considered”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “Divine Attributes Related to the Creature Part 5: The Goodness of God”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “1 Chronicles 28:9”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Simon Peter Sutherland, “Why Are False Teachers ‘Twice Dead’ in Jude?”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- How Do You Interpret Isaiah 45:7?
- Video: David Pallmann, “A Critique of Eternal Security Part 1: The Case For Eternal Security Considered”
- William Burt Pope, “Divine Attributes Related to the Creature Part 5: The Goodness of God”
- Richard Coords, “1 Chronicles 28:9”
- Simon Peter Sutherland, “Why Are False Teachers ‘Twice Dead’ in Jude?”
