This is just a brief note to draw attention to a mistake in the Assemblies of God position paper on “The Security of the Believer,” a note that has been added to the original post of the article here on SEA. Unfortunately, the paper claims that it takes a position between the two “extremes” of Calvinism and Arminianism when it actually takes the traditional, five point Arminian view of apostasy, that true believers can forsake faith in Christ and therefore perish as unbelievers. It seems that the Assemblies of God General Presbytery did not fully understand the Arminian position on apostasy at the time the paper was written, perhaps confusing traditional Arminianism with certain forms of Wesleyanism.
Home Apostasy A Brief Note on the Assemblies of God Position Paper on “The Security of the Believer”
Recent Posts
Eric Landstrom, Grace and Responsibility: A Response to the Calvinist Question, “Why One and Not Another?”
, Eric Landstrom, Comment Closed
If Jesus Died for All to Save Them Yet Not All Are Saved, Does That Mean He Failed or That He Requires the Lost to Pay for Sins Already Paid For?
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope on the Creation and Nature of Man
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine 17 Issue 1 (Spring 1999)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Who Is Jesus Christ? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Eric Landstrom, Grace and Responsibility: A Response to the Calvinist Question, “Why One and Not Another?”
- If Jesus Died for All to Save Them Yet Not All Are Saved, Does That Mean He Failed or That He Requires the Lost to Pay for Sins Already Paid For?
- William Burt Pope on the Creation and Nature of Man
- The Arminian Magazine 17 Issue 1 (Spring 1999)
- Who Is Jesus Christ? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
