Tom McCall and Keith Stanglin’s article S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK reviews Baugh’s arguments that the meaning of foreknowledge in the NT renders “impossible” the “Arminian notion of ‘foreseen faith’. Tom and Keith do a good job pointing out that Baugh assumes the irreconcilability of foreknowledge and free will from the outset (without arguing the point) and also that Baugh’s view is contrary to the teachings of the early church.
Home Author/Scholar Index: Calvinist Baugh. S. M. Friday Files: S. M. BAUGH AND THE MEANING OF FOREKNOWLEDGE: ANOTHER LOOK
Recent Posts
William Burt Pope on Inspiration as a Credential of Divine Revelation
, SEA, Comment Closed
Andrew Whitney Perkins, “Pauline Style and a Biblical Theology”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Mark K. Olson, “John Wesley on Life after Death”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “The Strongest Passage for Conditional Security”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Video: J. Matthew Pinson Interviewed on the Book, Jonathan Edwards: A Reformed Arminian Engagement
, SEA, Comment Closed
- William Burt Pope on Inspiration as a Credential of Divine Revelation
- Andrew Whitney Perkins, “Pauline Style and a Biblical Theology”
- Mark K. Olson, “John Wesley on Life after Death”
- Roy Ingle, “The Strongest Passage for Conditional Security”
- Video: J. Matthew Pinson Interviewed on the Book, Jonathan Edwards: A Reformed Arminian Engagement

Leave a Reply