This Week in Arminianism
, , Comments Off on This Week in Arminianism
- Dr. Roger Olson offers: “Why Hyper-Calvinism in Consistent Calvinism,” and “The Dialectic of ‘Nature and Grace’ in Christian Theology.”
- Traditional Southern Baptists at SBC Today highlight: Leighton Flowers’ “Corporate Election = Impersonal Election?” and Dr. Braxton Hunter’s “Altarcallphobia!“
- Roy Ingle, of Arminian Today, posts: “Signs of a Good Sermon.”
- Dr. Michael Brown asks: “Could Biblical Preaching Be Outlawed in America?“
- Dr. Dale Wayman, of IRONSTRIKES, writes: “Satan Convinces Us God’s Word is a Burden,” “Satan Contradicts God’s Word,” “Satan Casts Doubt on God’s Word,” and “Satan’s Playbook.”
- Seedbed brings us: “Jesus’ Cross, Resurrection, and Mission,” “Growing Churches That Grow Marriages,” and “Confession: I Miss You after Easter.”
- William Birch, of I, Jacob Arminius, posts: “Jacob Arminius on God’s Call of All to Salvation,” “Jacob Arminius’ Reformed Views on Justification,” “Determinism in the Hebrew Scriptures: Daniel,” “Determinism in the Hebrew Scriptures: Hosea,” and “John Piper on the Implications of Arminianism and the Atonement.”
- Evan Minton, of Cerebral Faith, asks: “Is 1 Corinthians 15:22 a Problem for Arminians?“
- Craig Adams, of Commonplace Holiness, offers: “Ministry is Servanthood.”
- Mike Barlotta, of Dead Heroes Don’t Save, brings us: “The Parable of the Midwives” (a must-read!), and “The West Wing Obsolescence (Applying Hebrews Today).”
- Deidre Richardson, of The Center for Theological Studies, writes: “Back to the Basics: Building Blocks for a Sound Theodicy, Pt. 4: What Genesis Teaches Us.”
- Russell Veldman, of Faster Unto Thee, grieves over “Bad Theology at Funerals.”
- The Helwys Society Forum hosted Jackson Watts’ book review of A Change of Heart: A Personal and Theological Memoir by Thomas C. Oden.
- Dr. Larry Hurtado offers: “Paul and Stoicism: Engberg-Pedersen Lecture.”
- Leighton Flowers, of Soteriology 101, posts: “Don’t Hate What You Don’t Understand: 5 Reasons for the Accusation of Misrepresentation When Debating Calvinism.”