In a blog post entitled, “Warning Passages Ahead: Brief Response,” (http://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed/2012/01/16/warning-passages-ahead-brief-response/) top notch Arminian-ish New Testament scholar Scot McKnight has responded to the view of top notch Calvinist New Testament scholar Peter O’Brien on O’Brien’s view of the warning passages in Hebrews (O’Brien has written a major commentary on Hebrews). In the comment section on the post, McKnight also responds very briefly but incisively to the view of Calvinist New Testament scholars Thomas Schreiner and Ardel Caneday (see comment numbers 5 and 8).
Home Additional Links Scot McKnight, A Brief Response to Some Calvinistic Views of the Warning Passages
Recent Posts
Brian Abasciano, “A Brief explanation of the Arminian View of Calling”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Does 1 John 3:7-10 Show That a Believer Cannot Abandon the Faith?
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “The Motive and the End of the Creation”
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine Volume 14 Issue 2 (Fall 1996)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Why Did the Son of God Become Human? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
, SEA, Comment Closed
- Brian Abasciano, “A Brief explanation of the Arminian View of Calling”
- Does 1 John 3:7-10 Show That a Believer Cannot Abandon the Faith?
- William Burt Pope, “The Motive and the End of the Creation”
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 14 Issue 2 (Fall 1996)
- Why Did the Son of God Become Human? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
