This is Cottrell’s response to Thomas Talbott’s essay, “UNIVERSAL RECONCILIATION AND THE INCLUSIVE NATURE OF ELECTION”, both in Perspectives on Election: Five Views (Ed. Chad Owen Brand; Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 2006). Click on the attachment: Cottrell. Response to Talbott on Universal Reconciliation and the Inclusive Nature of Election
Home Author/Scholar Index: Other or unknown Cottrell, Jack Jack W. Cottrell, Response to Universalist Thomas Talbott’s “Universal Reconciliation and the Inclusive Nature of Election”
Recent Posts
The Arminian Magazine Volume 11 Issue 2 (Fall 1993)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Is the Son God? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
, SEA, Comment Closed
How Do Arminians Answer Calvinist Appeal to 1 John 3:7-10 to Support That Believers Cannot Abandon the Faith?
, SEA, Comment Closed
Richard Coords, “Psalm 115:3”
, SEA, Comment Closed
William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 3: Dualism”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 11 Issue 2 (Fall 1993)
- Is the Son God? (Global Methodist Church Catechism)
- How Do Arminians Answer Calvinist Appeal to 1 John 3:7-10 to Support That Believers Cannot Abandon the Faith?
- Richard Coords, “Psalm 115:3”
- William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 3: Dualism”
