This is Cottrell’s response to Thomas Talbott’s essay, “UNIVERSAL RECONCILIATION AND THE INCLUSIVE NATURE OF ELECTION”, both in Perspectives on Election: Five Views (Ed. Chad Owen Brand; Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 2006). Click on the attachment: Cottrell. Response to Talbott on Universal Reconciliation and the Inclusive Nature of Election
Home Author/Scholar Index: Other or unknown Cottrell, Jack Jack W. Cottrell, Response to Universalist Thomas Talbott’s “Universal Reconciliation and the Inclusive Nature of Election”
Recent Posts
William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 7: Positivism”
, SEA, Comment Closed
The Arminian Magazine Volume 13 Issue 1 (Spring 1995)
, SEA, Comment Closed
Roy Ingle, “Book Review: A Theological Dictionary by Richard Watson”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Justin Gravatt, “Can Limited Atonement Survive 1 John 2:2? Responding to the Strongest Calvinist Objections to Christ Dying for the Whole World | Part 2”
, SEA, Comment Closed
Justin Gravatt, “Did Jesus Really Die for the Whole World? What 1 John 2:2 Reveals About the Scope of Christ’s Atonement | Part 1”
, SEA, Comment Closed
- William Burt Pope, “Theories Contradicting the Doctrine of Creation Part 7: Positivism”
- The Arminian Magazine Volume 13 Issue 1 (Spring 1995)
- Roy Ingle, “Book Review: A Theological Dictionary by Richard Watson”
- Justin Gravatt, “Can Limited Atonement Survive 1 John 2:2? Responding to the Strongest Calvinist Objections to Christ Dying for the Whole World | Part 2”
- Justin Gravatt, “Did Jesus Really Die for the Whole World? What 1 John 2:2 Reveals About the Scope of Christ’s Atonement | Part 1”
