<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Are Arminians Semi-Pelagian?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://evangelicalarminians.org/are-arminians-semi-pelagian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://evangelicalarminians.org/are-arminians-semi-pelagian/</link>
	<description>Not willing that any should perish</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 19:37:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Society of Evangelical Arminians &#124; Illegitimate Insistence on Arminius&#8217; Thought Being Semi-Pelagian in W. Robert Godfrey&#8217;s Review of *Jacob Arminius, Theologian of Grace*		</title>
		<link>https://evangelicalarminians.org/are-arminians-semi-pelagian/#comment-594</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Society of Evangelical Arminians &#124; Illegitimate Insistence on Arminius&#8217; Thought Being Semi-Pelagian in W. Robert Godfrey&#8217;s Review of *Jacob Arminius, Theologian of Grace*]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 19:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-594</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Dan Chapa&#8217;s &#8220;Are Arminians Semi-Pelagian?&#8221; goes back to the classic and standard source for defining Semi-Pelagianism, the Canons of Orange, and shows that Arminius and Arminianism are neither Pelagian nor Semi-Pelagian, refuting the arguments of J. I. Packer. This is definitive via primary source-work. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Dan Chapa&#8217;s &#8220;Are Arminians Semi-Pelagian?&#8221; goes back to the classic and standard source for defining Semi-Pelagianism, the Canons of Orange, and shows that Arminius and Arminianism are neither Pelagian nor Semi-Pelagian, refuting the arguments of J. I. Packer. This is definitive via primary source-work. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Are Arminians Semi-Pelagian? &#124; Arminian Perspectives		</title>
		<link>https://evangelicalarminians.org/are-arminians-semi-pelagian/#comment-176</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Are Arminians Semi-Pelagian? &#124; Arminian Perspectives]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Are Arminians Semi-Pelagian? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Are Arminians Semi-Pelagian? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk
Database Caching 59/65 queries in 0.025 seconds using Disk

Served from: evangelicalarminians.org @ 2026-08-22 23:12:54 by W3 Total Cache
-->