Reviewed Commentaries Ranked One to Eleven
The commentaries listed in the table below were subjectively ranked from one to eleven; one being the best, two the next best and so on. Linguistics was scored based on use of original languages and explaining things phrase by phrase. Logic was scored based on explaining the text, leaving the fewest unanswered questions and coherence of the big picture. Clarity was scored based on ease of reading and understanding the author.
|
Commentator |
Review | Linguistics | Logic | Clarity | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
4 |
3 |
4 |
10 |
||
|
8 |
5 |
1 |
14 |
||
|
3 |
2 |
10 |
15 |
||
|
7 |
4 |
5 |
16 |
||
|
6 |
1 |
11 |
18 |
||
|
2 |
11 |
6 |
19 |
||
|
1 |
10 |
8 |
19 |
||
|
11 |
7 |
2 |
20 |
||
|
5 |
6 |
9 |
20 |
||
|
10 |
8 |
4 |
22 |
||
|
9 |
9 |
7 |
25 |
Additional Resouces on Romans 9
My first commentary
My revised commentary
Wesley’s Predestination Calmly Considered
Joseph Sutcliffe’s brief commentary
Wesley’s Commentary
William Klein’s article: “Paul’s use of Kalein: A Proposal”
Brian Abasciano’s article Corporate Election in Romans 9
Brian Abasciano’s doctoral dissertation: “Paul’s Use of the Old Testament in Romans 9:1-9”
Glen Shellrude’s Evangelical Quarterly article, “The Freedom of God in Mercy and Judgment: A Libertarian Reading of Romans 9:6-29”
Ben Henshaw’s response to Calvinist C. Michael Patton on Romans 9
Dennis McCallum’s youtube clips
Brennon Hatshorn’s Thoughts
William Birch’s 22 part series on Romans 9
Kevin Jackson part 1
Kevin Jackson part 2
Skinner’s Commentary
Pristine Faith Restoration Society
This list is not comprehensive, but I would like it to be. If you know of other commentaries on Romans 9 from an Arminian perspective, please comment with a link. Thanks! (Comment here)
Leave a Reply