September 2009
Brian Abasciano, "Paul's Use of the Old Testament in Romans 9:1-9: An Intertextual and Theological Exegesis"
This is the author's doctoral dissertation (in the attachment below), which has been published in a shortened form under the same title by T & T Clark in its Journal for the Study of the New Testaemnt Supplement series and in its Library of New Testament Studies series: Brian J. Abasciano, Paul’s Use of the Old Testament in Romans 9.1-9: An Intertextual and Theological Exegesis (JSNTSup/LNTS, 301; London: T & T Clark, 2005).
The doctoral dissertation available here has a substantial amount of additional information compared to the published version because the published version had to be cut down to meet the publisher's space requirements. The published version refers back to the dissertationa for fuller information a number of times.
A Calvary-Focused Faith
Submitted by A.M. Mallett on Wed, 09/30/2009 - 7:30am"And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses; Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross; [And] having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it." (Col 2:13-15 AV)
During a recent discussion of the relevance of the resurrection with regard to Christ's crucifixion at Calvary, this passage from Paul's epistle to the Colossians came to mind. There is a thought I want to touch on dealing with the sufficiency of Christ's finished work at Calvary.
Church History and Calvinism
Submitted by Ben Henshaw on Tue, 09/29/2009 - 9:12amThe attached article (below) complements the post by Godismyjudge entitled Prereformation Church History & the Arminian/Calvinist Debate in showing that Arminianism not only has strong historical precedent in Christian history, but actually has far greater historical precedent than Calvinism. The author takes to task the erroneous claim of Talbot and Crampton (in the preface of the book, Calvinism Hyper-Calvinism and Arminianism) that, "Historically, the church has been predominantly Calvinistic". The second part of the article focuses on the fact that Calvinism can be traced back to the invention of a single influential individual in church history (and no, that person isn't the apostle Paul).
Resistible vs. Irresistible Grace: The Key Issue
Submitted by Godismyjudge on Mon, 09/28/2009 - 9:45amThe topic of resistible vs. irresistible grace is of vital importance. In my experience, the Calvinist's biggest objection to Arminianism is that it is a man-centered theology and gives man a reason to boast. In contrast, they view Calvinism as the "doctrines of grace". But what's the key issue?
The key issue is not:
Ephesians 2:1-2; A Devotional
Submitted by Martin Glynn on Sun, 09/27/2009 - 12:03pmAnd you were dead because of the transgressions and sins in which you once walked, as the world has through the ages according to the ruler of domain of the air ; the spirit now working in the unyielding6 sons.
A major aspect of Christian life is remembering where you came from. Christianity is fundamentally a faith of redemption. Part of redemption is being redeemed from something.
There are two common problems we encounter when dealing with our sinful past.
Book Review: The Shack
Submitted by Kevin Jackson on Thu, 09/24/2009 - 10:48am(Warning: this review contains spoilers)
What would you do if you were invited to spend a weekend with God? What questions would you ask him? Maybe, why does evil exist? Why is there pain? That is the background for the book "The Shack" (Author: William P. Young).
"The Shack" has become a phenomenon. As of today (9-24-09) it is ranked #11 in sales on Amazon.com, and has over 3700 reviews.
There is a dual reaction to the book in Christian circles: people either love it or despise it. I fall into the former category, with a reservation. I enjoyed the story. It brought me to tears a number of times. As a father of two girls, I empathized with the main character, "Mack".
A Challenge from Roger Olson for Calvinists
Submitted by SEA on Wed, 09/23/2009 - 7:34amAs I read Mark Talbot's chapter on God and suffering in Suffering and the Sovereignty of God (edited by John Piper and Justin Taylor) a thought occurred to me:
Prereformation Church History & the Calvinist/Arminian Debate
Submitted by Godismyjudge on Tue, 09/22/2009 - 8:36amCalivinists have a rich heritage - one that they can be proud of. It's unquestionable that Augustine, many of the Reformers and Puritans, held Calvinist ideas. But after reading Boettner's introduction of the Reformed Doctrine of Predestination, one might get the impression that Calvinism dominates Church history, and substantially every major theologian accepted Calvinisic predestination. Boettner claims:
Does God fail if we Resist?
Submitted by Godismyjudge on Mon, 09/21/2009 - 8:31amHodge’s first argument1 against resistible grace is:
P1: God, being infinite, cannot fail in any of His “serious intentions”
P2: God ordains all things according to His purpose
P3: If God wants His grace to convert us, and we resist and stay unconverted, God fails
C1: so grace is irresistible
Response
P1 & P2 are true but equivocal. P3 is false, so the conclusion does not follow.
Interesting Links 9-20-09
Submitted by Kevin Jackson on Sun, 09/20/2009 - 2:00amThis month's Christianity Today has some articles by Arminians in praise of John Calvin (yes, you read that right). Man of the Bible: What Calvin gets Right, by Ben Witherington. Theologian of the Spirit, by Roger Olson.
This pastor hates Obama, and preached a sermon on why he wishes the president dead. Although the article doesn't state it, I'm going to go way out on a limb and guess that the good reverend is not an Arminian.
Tim Challies has an article about his visit to Saddleback Church. He attended a service and met with Rick Warren for about 30 minutes.
Ephesians 1:22-23; A Devotional
Submitted by Martin Glynn on Sat, 09/19/2009 - 9:46amAnd He set everything under His feet, and made Him head over the assembly which is His body: the very thing which fills every bit of everything.
Ok, let us recall Paul's context:
Friday Files: Vance A CRITIQUE OF THE POTTER’S FREEDOM
Submitted by Godismyjudge on Fri, 09/18/2009 - 7:02pmLaurence Vance's article A CRITIQUE OF THE POTTER’S FREEDOM by James White identifies, catalogues and handles White's rhetoric in favor of Calvinism. While the focus of the article is on rhetoric, Vance does make some incisive points. First, in some circles Baptist Calvinists are seen as only second-class Calvinists. Second, the fact that God is sovereign is obvious. If God was not sovereign he would not be God. The rulers of many countries have absolute sovereignty, but that does not mean they are holy or even good. The important
thing about God is that he is sovereign yet holy.